Sarah Sidlow, The Motley Fool
Wed, December 31, 2025 astatine 8:11 AM CST 5 min read
-
VBR is overmuch larger and much liquid than ISCV, but comes with a somewhat higher disbursal ratio.
-
ISCV holds much stocks, portion VBR has delivered stronger five-year growth.
-
Both ETFs tilt toward small-cap worth stocks, but assemblage weights and apical holdings uncover subtle differences.
-
These 10 stocks could mint the adjacent question of millionaires ›
The Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (NYSEMKT:VBR) and the iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF (NYSEMKT:ISCV) some people U.S. small-cap worth stocks, but disagree successful size, liquidity, yield, and five-year performance.
Both funds purpose to supply wide vulnerability to small-cap U.S. companies with worth characteristics, but they instrumentality somewhat antithetic approaches. This examination unpacks their costs, performance, portfolio makeup, and unsocial traits to assistance investors determine which whitethorn amended acceptable a small-cap worth allocation.
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.07% |
| 1-yr instrumentality (as of Dec. 16, 2025) | 3.3% | 2.7% |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 1.97% |
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.01 |
| AUM | $574.6 million | $59.6 billion |
Beta measures terms volatility comparative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year play returns. The 1-yr instrumentality represents full instrumentality implicit the trailing 12 months.
ISCV is somewhat much affordable with a 0.06% disbursal ratio, portion VBR’s 0.07% interest is besides debased by manufacture standards. VBR's somewhat higher output and little beta whitethorn entreaty to income investors.
| Max drawdown (5 y) | (50.84%) | (46.57%) |
| Growth of $1,000 implicit 5 years | $1,472 | $1,502 |
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF tracks a wide small-cap worth index, holding 831 stocks with a 21.9-year way record. Its assemblage allocation leans toward Industrials (21.7%), Financial Services (19.8%), and Consumer Discretionary (14.2%). Top holdings see NRG Energy (NYSE:NRG), Sandisk (NASDAQ:SNDK), and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME), each representing little than 1% of assets. The fund’s $59.6 cardinal successful assets nether absorption (AUM) provides heavy liquidity, and its attack is strictly passive.
ISCV besides targets small-cap worth stocks but with a somewhat antithetic assemblage mix: Financial Services (24.5%), Consumer Discretionary (13.5%), and Industrials (13%). Unlike the Vanguard ETF, this money tracks an scale composed of small-cap U.S. equities that grounds worth characteristics. It holds implicit 1,100 names, spreading hazard broadly. Its largest positions -- Annaly Capital Management(NYSE:NLY), Viatris (NASDAQ:VTRS), and Everest Group (NYSE:EG) -- each marque up little than 1% of the fund. Neither ETF introduces leverage, currency hedging, oregon different structural quirks.

2 hours ago
1





English (CA) ·
English (US) ·
Spanish (MX) ·