The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT:IVV) and the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT:VOO) some service arsenic foundational gathering blocks for semipermanent portfolios by tracking the S&P 500 index.
While they stock the aforesaid nonsubjective and outgo structure, subtle differences separate these 2 manufacture giants for idiosyncratic investors.
Snapshot (cost & size)
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| 1-yr instrumentality (as of May 23, 2026) | 29.47% | 29.43% |
| Dividend yield | 1.12% | 1.08% |
| Beta (5Y monthly) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Assets nether absorption (AUM) | $797.5 billion | $1.6 trillion |
Beta measures terms volatility comparative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr instrumentality represents full instrumentality implicit the trailing 12 months. Dividend output is the trailing-12-month organisation yield.
With matching 0.03% disbursal ratios, outgo is not a differentiator betwixt these 2 marketplace leaders. While some funds connection accordant income streams, IVV offers a marginally higher dividend yield.
Performance & hazard examination
| Max drawdown (5 yr) | -24.52% | -24.53% |
| Growth of $1,000 implicit 5 years (total return) | $1,930 | $1,930 |
What's wrong
VOO holds conscionable implicit 500 stocks and was launched successful 2010. It is designed to way the S&P 500, offering wide vulnerability to the home equity market. Its assemblage allocation is presently led by exertion astatine astir 36% of assets, followed by fiscal services astatine 12% and connection services astatine 11%, and its apical holdings see Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft.
IVV besides tracks the S&P 500, truthful it’s akin to VOO successful galore ways. Its apical assemblage allocations and apical 3 stocks lucifer VOO’s, but it was launched successful 2000, giving it a longer operating history.
For much guidance connected ETF investing, cheque retired the afloat usher astatine this link.
What this means for investors
IVV and VOO some way the aforesaid underlying index, truthful determination are fewer characteristics that acceptable them apart.
With the aforesaid disbursal ratios and virtually identical max drawdowns and one- and five-year full returns, investors won’t spot a meaningful quality successful fees, risk, oregon concern earnings. IVV does connection a marginally higher dividend yield, however, which could adhd up implicit clip for investors with ample relationship balances.
Perhaps the astir important quality betwixt the 2 funds is assets nether absorption (AUM). VOO has a overmuch larger AUM of astir $1.6 trillion compared to IVV’s $798 billion. While some of these monolithic ETFs supply ample liquidity, VOO has the borderline for investors looking to bargain oregon merchantability ample amounts astatine a time.
For astir mundane investors, AUM won’t needfully beryllium a selling constituent — particularly erstwhile some funds are among the largest successful the industry. But due to the fact that these ETFs are identical successful astir different ways, AUM, dividend yield, and preferences connected brokerages volition apt beryllium the deciding factors for investors.

1 hour ago
2





English (CA) ·
English (US) ·
Spanish (MX) ·