Three choices now define Trump's Iran war and all of them have a cost

In the months starring up to the 2003 penetration of Iraq, I served arsenic a strategist astatine the Pentagon, wherever I had antithetic entree to subject thinking, quality assessments, and senior-level discussions. I regularly attended meetings hosted by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Richard Myers.

From the outside, it looked similar Washington spoke with 1 assured voice. The Bush medication telegraphed certainty, and overmuch of the media echoed it.

That was not my view.

The much accusation I received, the much questions I asked. What would triumph look like? How galore troops would beryllium required? What would travel aft Baghdad fell? Were we prepared for a prolonged occupation? Did we afloat recognize the political, tribal, religious, and determination forces we were astir to unleash?

PRESIDENT TRUMP’S IRAN WARNING IS SERIOUS — BUT AMERICANS NEED THE FULL FACTS

Those questions were swept speech by assurance successful America's subject superiority.

The authorities fell quickly. The warfare did not.

What followed cost America more than 4,400 subject deaths, implicit 32,000 wounded, and much than 2 trillion dollars. The struggle created the conditions that gave emergence to ISIS, a menace that inactive plagues the region.

One 100 days into the Iran war, I find myself asking galore of those aforesaid questions again.

THE CEASEFIRE THAT ISN'T

The fragile intermission that began successful aboriginal April has unraveled. On June 9, an Iranian Shahed drone struck a U.S. Army AH-64 Apache chopper patrolling adjacent the Strait of Hormuz — the archetypal Apache nonaccomplishment of the conflict. Both unit members were rescued and are safe. President Trump instantly declared connected Truth Social that "the United States must, of necessity, respond to this attack." U.S. Central Command launched retaliatory strikes the aforesaid day.

Iran answered by targeting U.S. subject bases in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan — the 2nd consecutive time of Iranian strikes connected American positions successful the region.

A second wave of U.S. strikes deed "multiple targets" successful Iran connected June 10. The Strait of Hormuz — the chokepoint that carries 20 percent of planetary lipid — remains contested. Brent crude climbed to $91.10 per tube Wednesday. The S&P is down 4.5 percent from its June 2 grounds high.

Even arsenic the bombs fell, Trump told reporters a woody was "two oregon 3 days" distant and that the Strait would reopen "immediately" erstwhile Iran signed. The Iranian parliament talker said Trump's nationalist statements "contradicted the agreed-upon sections," signaling that Tehran sees nary statement adjacent astatine hand.

The administration's mentation is understandable. Increased costs volition yet person Tehran that compromise is preferable to continued punishment. History suggests the substance is not that simple.

PATTERN WASHINGTON KEEPS MISSING

Iran has responded arsenic it has for astir fractional a century. It negotiates. It delays. It demands concessions. It links 1 contented to another. It seeks leverage portion avoiding irreversible commitments.

In caller Fox News columns, I person argued that Washington's top misunderstanding of Iran is the presumption that the authorities thinks arsenic we do. America seeks resolution. Tehran seeks survival. America wants closure. Iran wants time.

The 60-day MOU framework that emerged successful precocious May offered Iran the quality to merchantability lipid freely, a moratorium connected enrichment successful speech for sanctions relief, and a way to atomic talks. Tehran's overseas curate called a woody "just inches away" portion simultaneously accusing U.S. negotiators of "maximalist demands."

That signifier — beforehand and obstruct, concede, and reclaim — has defined Iranian diplomacy since 1979. It should not astonishment anyone successful Washington. The astonishment is that we support expecting a antithetic result.

TRUMP’S IRAN WAR NOW COMES DOWN TO ONE BRUTAL QUESTION: WHAT COMES NEXT?

Iran's foreign minister put it plainly aft the Apache was downed: "Foreign forces successful proximity to our territory are astatine changeless risk. To trim risk, champion solution is for them to leave."

That is not the connection of a authorities preparing to motion a last agreement. It is the connection of a authorities buying time.

THREE CHOICES, EACH WITH A PRICE

President Trump present faces 3 stark choices, and each carries costs Washington has yet to honestly acknowledge.

The archetypal is escalation. If the nonsubjective is the imperishable elimination of Iran's atomic programme and Tehran refuses to surrender it, the logic yet points beyond airpower to thing acold larger. Iran is not Iraq successful 2003. It is larger, much populous, and much hard geographically. Mountain ranges predominate overmuch of the country. Tehran sits heavy inland. The unit required would dwarf adjacent what we assembled for Iraqi Freedom successful 2003 — and that conjugation included the British, Australians, Poles, and dozens of different contributing nations. No comparable confederation exists for a warfare with Iran. Europe would beryllium this 1 out. That means mobilizing not conscionable the progressive unit but much, if not all, of the National Guard and Reserve components, without the allied burden-sharing Washington had successful Iraq. That arithmetic has not been enactment earlier the American people.

Capturing Tehran would beryllium difficult. Holding it would beryllium a generational commitment. Determining what follows would beryllium harder still.

The 2nd is semipermanent containment. This accepts an uncomfortable reality: Iran whitethorn ne'er willingly negociate distant what its rulers see a strategical necessity. Containment combines subject deterrence, sanctions, maritime security, quality operations, and stronger determination partnerships. It requires patience alternatively than melodramatic declarations. It lacks the entreaty of decisive triumph, but it whitethorn amended bespeak the realities of confronting a authorities that measures clip successful decades alternatively than predetermination cycles. We held the Soviet Union astatine bay for 50 years done precisely this attack — containment reinforced by mutually assured destruction. The Soviets had thousands of atomic warheads and the means to present them. The strategy worked not due to the fact that we liked the odds, but due to the fact that we were honorable astir them. The aforesaid subject applies here.

The 3rd is an equipped truce, which is what Trump is inactive pursuing. Negotiations proceed contempt the renewed strikes. But immoderate statement indispensable beryllium judged by results, not promises. A woody that pauses the warring portion leaving the halfway quality unresolved does not lick the problem. It postpones the adjacent situation — and apt astatine higher cost.

In my books Preparing for World War III and Kings of the East, I argued that America's main adversaries deliberation successful generational terms. China does. Russia does. Iran surely does. They sorb setbacks contiguous to amended their presumption tomorrow. Every week of ceasefire that does not nutrient irreversible denuclearization is simply a week Tehran uses to reconstitute, reposition, and hold retired Washington's governmental calendar.

THE QUESTION THAT STILL HAS NO ANSWER

The president's situation is not a deficiency of subject options. The United States remains the world's astir susceptible warring force. The situation is defining an achievable governmental nonsubjective and being honorable with the American radical astir what it costs.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

If the extremity is regime-ending victory, the American radical merit a frank accounting of the scale, duration, and quality outgo of that commitment.

If the extremity is containment, Washington indispensable halt suggesting that further bombing runs volition unit Tehran's surrender.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

If the extremity is simply a negotiated settlement, verification indispensable substance much than optimistic timelines. An Iran that agrees contiguous and reconstitutes time is not a solved problem.

The hardest question facing President Trump is the aforesaid 1 I asked portion sitting wrong the Pentagon earlier Iraq.

Not whether America tin triumph battles. We can.

Not whether America tin destruct targets. We can.

The existent question is what governmental result justifies everything that comes afterward — and whether we are prepared to beryllium honorable astir the reply earlier the adjacent Apache goes down.

Wars of prime statesman with confidence. They extremity erstwhile leaders yet face the choices they hoped to avoid.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM ROBERT MAGINNIS