Charlie Javice Faces Accusations Of Billing JPMorgan For Personal Expenses Amid $74M Legal Claim

3 hours ago 2

Charlie Javice, a convicted startup founder, is facing allegations of billing JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) for idiosyncratic expenses arsenic portion of a $74 cardinal ineligible claim.

What Happened: Javice, who was convicted for defrauding JPMorgan, is believed to person charged the slope for idiosyncratic items specified arsenic cellulite food and luxury edifice upgrades. The slope has already been billed implicit $142 million in ineligible fees for Javice and her co-executive Olivier Amar to combat national fraud charges.

JPMorgan is present attempting to revise a judge’s bid to halt immoderate further fees. Michael Pittinger, the bank’s lawyer, described the lawsuit arsenic having “extreme abuses” successful a Delaware court, reports The Wall Street Journal.

Javice’s spokesperson, Juda Engelmayer, denied the allegations, asserting that the expenses were not billed by Javice but by her ineligible team. The ineligible squad is accused of submitting bills claiming they worked hours that were “humanly impossible.”

Javice was recovered guilty on 4 fraud counts in March and sentenced to implicit 7 years successful prison. Despite her conviction, she continues to measure JPMorgan for legal expenses related to her appeal.

Also Read: After $175 Million Scam, JPMorgan Battles $115M successful Legal Fees: ‘Patently Excessive and Egregious’

JPMorgan acquired Javice’s fintech startup Frank for $175 cardinal in 2021. However, she was arrested 2 years aboriginal erstwhile it was revealed that the startup’s value was based connected falsified subscription numbers.

Pablo Rodriguez, a spokesperson for JPMorgan, stated, “We continue to judge the legal fees sought by Charlie Javice and Olivier Amar are patently excessive and egregious.”

Why It Matters: This lawsuit underlines the imaginable risks and challenges associated with firm acquisitions. JPMorgan’s acquisition of Frank successful 2021 turned sour erstwhile it was discovered that the startup’s worth was inflated owed to falsified subscription numbers.

The ongoing ineligible conflict and the associated costs further exacerbate the concern for the bank. The result of this lawsuit could perchance power aboriginal acquisition strategies and owed diligence processes for corporations.